coherence_review · supabase_json
AD SEO Agent coherence_review
coherence_review artifact · for AD SEO Agent · status draft
open questions
| id | owner | answer | blocks | status | question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQ-COH-001 | vikram | Monday approval decisions remain demo-local/read-only in browser sessionStorage through a service abstraction. Persisted Supabase/Cloudflare approval writes are deferred unless Justin explicitly reopens architecture/decomposition before build dispatch. | Only approval write behavior; does not block decomposition for the read-only product route. | answered | Should Monday approval decisions persist to Supabase Projects/Demo immediately or remain demo-local/read-only until auth/policy is finalized? |
Agent Handoff
Start Here
coherence_review artifact · for AD SEO Agent · status draft
Completion Evidence
No explicit evidence field yet. Require tests, screenshots, linked PRs, or reviewed outputs before marking complete.
Open Questions
- OQ-COH-001: id: string, owner: string, answer: string, blocks: string, status: string, question: string, source_question_ids: object
Structured Payload
Machine-readable source fields
review
id
REVIEW-001
status
complete
verdict
approved
reviewer
atlas-codex
created at
2026-05-01T00:00:00-04:00
model or agent
GPT-5 Codex
handoff
notes for decomp
- AD SEO Agent is a client project, not a BezelIQ Studio or internal Studio feature.
- Use C:/Users/jstnk/Downloads/cc/projects/seo-studio as canonical client repo. Existing implementation must be audited against artifacts before task planning.
- Existing C:/Users/jstnk/Downloads/cc/projects/seo-studio implementation is unapproved prototype output; audit it before reuse.
- Separate core read-only product route from approval persistence work so Monday demo is not blocked by auth/policy decisions.
accepted risk ids
- FIND-002
blocking finding ids
No items captured.
ready for decomposition
true
project
id
ad-seo-agent
name
AD SEO Agent for Affiliated Distributor Networks
client id
ad
platform project id
0.0.8832348
platform project title
AD SEO Agent
coverage
features
| notes | ux status | feature id | architecture status | requirements status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-01 | covered | present |
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-02 | covered | present |
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-03 | covered | present |
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-04 | covered | present |
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-05 | covered | present |
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-06 | covered | present |
| Covered by updated AI-first product route, object model, and Cloudflare/Supabase architecture. | covered | F-07 | covered | present |
must show
| item | ux ref | coverage status | architecture ref | requirements ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubbard Supply Co. domain and industrial/MRO context are visible in the first experience. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[0] |
| ROI appears before keyword tables: current spend baseline, projected savings, organic traffic value, and pipeline impact. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[1] |
| Competitor analysis is actionable: vulnerable keywords, why they are winnable, estimated value, and next actions. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[2] |
| Agent cluster activity is visible and specific: crawler, competitor analyst, content gap analyst, backlink analyst, recommendation planner. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[3] |
| Every recommendation has reasoning, confidence, governance tier, and an execution path. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[4] |
| Human approval boundaries are explicit for publishing, outreach, and strategic decisions. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[5] |
| White-label story is visible without requiring a full white-label admin console. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[6] |
| agent infrastructure is revealed subtly through observability, audit trail, or agent activity. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[7] |
AD SEO Agent appears as a client project, available at /seo with /products/seo as a short alias if routing supports it. | UX_SPEC surfaces S-01 through S-07 | covered | ARCHITECTURE stack/services/data model | product_summary.must_show[8] |
findings
| id | type | owner | impact | status | summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIND-001 | requirements_architecture_conflict | atlas | Build work could ship to the wrong host/shell and fail the product-suite objective. | resolved | Earlier artifacts treated an internal suite/repo as the deployment host, conflicting with the client-project boundary. |
| FIND-002 | implementation_risk | vikram | Decomposition must separate read-only product route from approval-write implementation to avoid blocking the demo. | resolved_for_monday | Approval persistence remains deferred pending auth/policy details. |
dev studio
views
- verdict
- feature_coverage_matrix
- must_show_coverage
- findings
- open_questions
- return_instructions
- handoff
render as
coherence_review
model reviews
| id | model | status | provider | task type | evidence ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MODEL-COH-001 | sonnet | applied | claude | architecture-review | tmp/model-runsad-seo-agent-claude-architecture-review-ask-model.json |
open questions
| id | owner | answer | blocks | status | question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQ-COH-001 | vikram | Monday approval decisions remain demo-local/read-only in browser sessionStorage through a service abstraction. Persisted Supabase/Cloudflare approval writes are deferred unless Justin explicitly reopens architecture/decomposition before build dispatch. | Only approval write behavior; does not block decomposition for the read-only product route. | answered | Should Monday approval decisions persist to Supabase Projects/Demo immediately or remain demo-local/read-only until auth/policy is finalized? |
schema version
1.0
source artifacts
policy ref
No value captured.
ux spec ref
docs/projects/ad-seo-agent/artifacts/UX_SPEC.json
architecture ref
docs/projects/ad-seo-agent/artifacts/ARCHITECTURE.json
requirements ref
docs/projects/ad-seo-agent/artifacts/REQUIREMENTS.json
platform project id
0.0.8832348
return instructions
No items captured.
approved source refs
ux
- S-01
- S-02
- S-03
- S-04
- S-05
- S-06
- S-07
- FL-01
- FL-02
- FL-03
- FL-04
- FL-05
- FL-06
policy
No items captured.
architecture
- F-01
- F-02
- F-03
- F-04
- F-05
- F-06
- F-07
- SVC-001
- SVC-002
- SVC-003
- SVC-004
- SVC-005
- SVC-006
- SVC-007
requirements
- F-01
- F-02
- F-03
- F-04
- F-05
- F-06
- F-07